<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Smart, Code Stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/</link>
	<description>Programming, Life in the UK, Humor, Books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ippimail.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When good software gets complicated</title>
		<link>http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>ippimail.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When good software gets complicated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>[...] lot of recent articles have raised the issue of complexity in software (here, here, and here). So why is this subject back again? Surely it&#8217;s been done to death? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lot of recent articles have raised the issue of complexity in software (here, here, and here). So why is this subject back again? Surely it&#8217;s been done to death? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh DeWald</title>
		<link>http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh DeWald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Good thing I&#039;m not a Real Programmer (I hope...)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing I&#8217;m not a Real Programmer (I hope&#8230;)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quay.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/design-smart-code-stupid/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>What about if you are a &quot;Real Programmer&quot;?  &quot;If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.&quot;

Jargon file to the rescue:

http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/R/Real-Programmer.html

ESR says it&#039;s so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about if you are a &#8220;Real Programmer&#8221;?  &#8220;If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jargon file to the rescue:</p>
<p><a href="http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/R/Real-Programmer.html" rel="nofollow">http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/R/Real-Programmer.html</a></p>
<p>ESR says it&#8217;s so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
